I don't know if its fair for "bad" things to happen to bystanders. I put bad in quotations because the Techies rework wasn't bad for anyone but those like me who enjoyed how Techies was. Moreover, I had to tie the contents of this post into karma because I'd like you all to know that these posts are actively COSTING karma to post lmao. Not that I care, reddit karma is worthless anyways. THE CONCEPT of karma got me thinking though. People will say to me "you deserve to rot in hell for liking/wishing for (old) Techies!" and then Valve, instead of protecting what Techies players enjoyed about Techies, caved into the often toxic public demand. I don't think it's fair to tell Techies players, or anyone, to kill themselves/call them slurs and then act like you did a good thing. It seems weird to me is all I'm saying. Why didn't they work to appease both sides? I feel like Techies mains got shafted to a certain extent. There have been some responding to these posts saying that they enjoy the changes, and I am glad that they do. It's just something I can't fully relate to, and I know that there are others who agree. I'm not fighting for old techies to comeback, but I am fighting for less homogenization and I want to see Tazer burn. I want more mines, less combos. I hate that we are actively incentivized NOT to mine; it was the hero's whole gimmick.
In other words, I will keep fighting to keep spreading the Good Word of Techies. Please be nice in pubs, positivity wins games. GLHF all and thanks for reading.
PS: here's a poll about tazer.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/DotA2/comments/xs682w/techies_talk_day_6_karma/
