The in-game display of dispersion reduction contradicts tanks.gg

First time posting here, just wanna see if anybody realize this as well.

So one of the trick I‘ve learnt about tanks with bad gun handling, such as T57 heavy and obj430U, is to use bounty irm (-15%) + bond vstab (-27.5%). According to WG’s in-game display, this results in a 42.5% reduction (47.5% with vstab directive) of dispersion during movements, which improve the gun handling significantly. The magic here is that according to in-game display, irm and vstab stack in simple subtraction.

However, recently on tanks gg I found out that according to them, irm and vstab stack in multiplication. For example, batchat 25t start with an after firing dispersion factor of 4, which with bounty irm and bond vstab should be reduced to 4(1-(0.15+0.275) = 4 0.575 = 2.3; However, tanksgg says the result is 2.46, a rather underwhelming effect that fits into the model 4×0.85×0.725, which is different from what the in-game display would suggest.

TLDR: WG’s in-game display may be exaggerating the stacking effect of irm and vstab.

Gamer

Recent Posts

Ledx have been so hard for me this wipe

Not being able to craft them sucks. Especially when everyone I talk to about it…

1 year ago

My interesting and unfortunate Gwent life

First I'd like to say I absolutely love this game it's quality. Basically I first…

1 year ago

Teacher Tuesday 12/Dec/2023 – ask your questions here!

Welcome to Teacher Tuesday, a thread where anyone can ask any type of question without…

1 year ago

This games balance is confusing

I’m kind of new/returning to gwent I played beta and obviously it’s a lot lot…

1 year ago

Summary of 10 Days of Draws from Chaffee’s Bundles

Level 1 Bag (Free with Atmosphere Level 2) 6 small consumable (First Aid, Repair, Fire…

1 year ago

Why is my crew at 135%?

Here's my crew - T34-85M - for the life of me I cant figure out…

1 year ago