Full-chain games have quietly emerged from the perspective of on-chain data verification, ownership, and programmable assets

During the last round of the bull market, GameFi attracted many users by monetizing game assets and props. The projects represented by Axie and StepN feature a variety of circle-breaking effects.

But I had that feeling that the money-making Ponzi scheme also did not escape the death spiral’s fate, because the gameplay was financially heavy, and many serious players were discouraged.

Do you think that full-chain games have quietly emerged from the perspective of on-chain data verification, ownership, and programmable assets?

Although the concept hasn't reached the majority of users, it has gained attention from investors, high-end Gamefi fans, and certain industry pioneers. All players, in my opinion, require a game with a high degree of decentralization, fair and clear mechanics, transparency, and composability.

Axie Infinity, Coin Fantasy, and Neon District are the only games I actually enjoy playing at the moment.

Because of the underlying infrastructure's performance difficulties, the majority of mainstream blockchain game creators have historically used offline game behavior. Only the finished product pertaining to the property is uploaded.

At this time, it is still not viable to remove the on-chain performance constraint for full-chain games. It would unquestionably be a light game mode if the entire game's action took place online.