I'm sorry if this has been asked before, but I haven't seen someone asking for it. Maybe it is dumb question, but how do you grade your review cases?
Like what will trigger positive for you if the player is hacking/scripting or not guilty.
The Feeding/Griefing is very debatable in my opinion which is why I want to see your opinions.
One may feed directly by just walking down mid and one may feed indirectly if they are:
- Bad players
- Enemy counter picked
- Enemy didn't counter picked but played better
- -||- list may go further
How do you grade this? Guilty, Not Guilty or Insufficient Evidence?
Griefing on the other hand could include more factors as well, which are:
- Feeding?
- Not participating in fights?
- Ability abuse e.g. tiny toss/pudge shard or hook
- Body blocking with any hero while you trying to go somewhere or just follows you around doing nothing.
- Buying wards and place them in base or gives them to the enemy
- -||- list may go further
Again, how do you grade by the most common 'griefing' points under 1 and 2 with question marks?
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/DotA2/comments/puq521/how_do_you_guys_grade_the_overwatch_case_system/